<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DigitalBattle &#187; 8800 gt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalbattle.com/tag/8800-gt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalbattle.com</link>
	<description>The pulse of video game culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:25:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia reconsidering GTS 240 re-naming</title>
		<link>http://digitalbattle.com/2009/03/12/nvidia-reconsidering-gts-240-re-naming/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalbattle.com/2009/03/12/nvidia-reconsidering-gts-240-re-naming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Briggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8800 gt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9800 gt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gts 240]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbattle.com/?p=19561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While ATI went and developed new GPUs, Nvidia has been &#8230; <a href="http://digitalbattle.com/2009/03/12/nvidia-reconsidering-gts-240-re-naming/">Read on <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalbattle.com/2009/03/12/nvidia-reconsidering-gts-240-re-naming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

